Current:Home > NewsPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -RiskWatch
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
View
Date:2025-04-21 21:51:41
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (757)
Related
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- AI companies agree to voluntary safeguards, Biden announces
- Women are earning more money. But they're still picking up a heavier load at home
- Special counsel continues focus on Trump in days after sending him target letter
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- The U.S. just updated the list of electric cars that qualify for a $7,500 tax credit
- ‘Stripped of Everything,’ Survivors of Colorado’s Most Destructive Fire Face Slow Recoveries and a Growing Climate Threat
- Olivia Rodrigo Makes a Bloody Good Return to Music With New Song Vampire
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Biden Could Score a Climate Victory in a Single Word: Plastics
Ranking
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Rural grocery stores are dying. Here's how some small towns are trying to save them
- Honoring Bruce Lee
- Big Agriculture and the Farm Bureau Help Lead a Charge Against SEC Rules Aimed at Corporate Climate Transparency
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- First raise the debt limit. Then we can talk about spending, the White House insists
- Child dies from brain-eating amoeba after visiting hot spring, Nevada officials say
- How Climate and the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Undergirds the Ukraine-Russia Standoff
Recommendation
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
Michael Cohen settles lawsuit against Trump Organization
Why Tia Mowry Says Her 2 Kids Were Part of Her Decision to Divorce Cory Hardrict
Australia bans TikTok from federal government devices
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
An indicator that often points to recession could be giving a false signal this time
Venezuela sees some perks of renewed ties with Colombia after years of disputes
Human remains found in luggage in separate Texas, Florida incidents